Post by CGkenBMC on Jun 2, 2018 17:25:43 GMT -5
I get the idea however, lets just says for arguments sake identical twins get drafted and they both have the same exact attributes, height, weight, speed, arm length, etc etc and lets say they are RBs, one gets drafted by an indoor team like the cowboys and the other gets drafted by the Giants, they both start the same amount of games and get the same amount of touches, however the Cowboys RB gets 1200 yds, a 5.1 YPG and 12 TDs and voted to the pro bowl, the Giants guy gets 700 yds, 2.7 YPG and 6 TDs, based purely on performance you'd say the cowboys drafted better then the Giants, nowhere is there room for data such as weather conditions, o-line talent, strength of schedule. I look at a player like Matt Cassel, the one year he started for the Pats he was pretty darn good and BB looked like a genius for drafting him, he goes to the Chiefs and he flopped, maybe the genius was actually trading him away, but was an average QB who benefited from a good coach and game plan or was he a great QB who was hampered by a poor coach and game plan on the Chiefs?
If you're drafting players who don't play well in cold weather or who don't fit well with your roster/gameplan, then you aren't drafting well imo.