Post by brownelvis54 on Feb 29, 2024 22:11:37 GMT -5
There is a chance the Giants don't take a QB this year in the first two rounds. In fact, I think it's closer to not taking one in the first 2 rounds. There have been multiple NFL ex-players, NFL analysist, and ex GMs saying the same thing, "Build the team".
Put NFL analyst Chris Simms firmly in the ‘build around Daniel Jones’ camp when it comes to the question of what the New York Giants should do at quarterback this offseason. There has been a constant stream of chatter about the possibility the Giants are considering moving up from No. 6 to No. 3 — provided the New England Patriots are willing to move out of that spot — to get one of the top three quarterbacks.
“What are we going to do. The first two quarterbacks come off the board, we want a quarterback, now we’re going to trade up,” Simms said. “The Giants have got holes everywhere. And we’re just going to leave holes and ‘hey, quarterback, save the day.’ That just doesn’t sound like the Giant way to me.”
When I ran the trade up from No. 6 to No. 3 in my most recent multi-round Giants mock draft, I used 2018 precedent set by the Jets and Colts of three second-round picks to move up. The down side of that scenario is that while the Giants get a quarterback at No. 3, they don’t pick again until No. 70 in Round 3.
www.nj.com/sports/2024/02/giants-daniel-jones-is-better-than-qb-whos-rising-up-mock-drafts-expert-says.html
For me, I personally would not be upset if we didn't get a QB in the first two rounds. I agree with Simms, we need to build the team. We are stuck with Jones and Cutlets anyways. Where I would be upset is if we dont at least take a late round QB at some point. Why? Because there is a chance, we could get lucky. This late round QB can sit an entire year and learn from Kaftka and Daboll, and if he dosent prove to be a future starter.... well then, he could develop into our back up QB for the next few years. Green Bay and San Francisco have a long history of drafting QBs in the later rounds even though they had a starting QB already. Even New England Patriots started doing the same thing. They produced Matt Cassell, Jimmy Garoppolo, and Jacoby Brissett, while still having Brady, in fact they had Bledsoe and then drafted Brady. They used some of those guys for draft capital too.
Build the damn team. I don't care how they do it: WR, LBer, CB, Guard, Tackle, RB, Safety, EDGE....crap we need everything. Get your blue-chip players with the first FOUR picks....players that can be studs, then get the best QB with one of our late picks.
These are the 3 guys I would look at. What do you think? Any of them look good to you? Do you have a guy you like?
Here is stats and film review on all three guys. The good and bad are discussed on all videos. When watching keep in mind, these guys will sit most if not all year one...and that's the way it should be anyway.
walterfootball.com/draft2024QB.php
Michael Pratt
2/27/24: Pratt was a consistent quarterback for the Green Wave over the last four years. In 2023, he completed 66 percent of his passes for 2,406 yards, 22 touchdowns and five interceptions. In 2022, he completed 64 percent of his passes for 3,010 yards, 27 touchdowns and five interceptions. Pratt has quality size to him. At the Senior Bowl, he did not impress enough to boost his draft stock.
Joe Milton
2/27/24: Milton started out his collegiate career at Michigan before transferring to Tennessee. With good size and a cannon for an arm, Milton has serious passing talent for the next level. Milton can be deadly when given time, but he does not throw well on the run. In the pocket, Milton can be accurate and challenge defenses at every level. In 2023, he completed 65 percent of his passes for 2,813 yards, 20 touchdowns and five interceptions. Milton had an inconsistent week of practice at the Senior Bowl
Spencer Rattler
2/27/24: Rattler completed 69 percent of his passes in 2023 for 3,186 yards, 19 touchdowns and eight interceptions. He picked up four rushing touchdowns as well. Despite the losses, Rattler played well including impressive games versus North Carolina and Georgia. Rattler impressed some NFL team sources with his arm, playmaking ability, and his ability to ad lib his team into some big plays. However, others said they are very down on him because of the turnovers and decision-making. They also noted that Rattler looked slower and less mobile in 2023.
Put NFL analyst Chris Simms firmly in the ‘build around Daniel Jones’ camp when it comes to the question of what the New York Giants should do at quarterback this offseason. There has been a constant stream of chatter about the possibility the Giants are considering moving up from No. 6 to No. 3 — provided the New England Patriots are willing to move out of that spot — to get one of the top three quarterbacks.
“What are we going to do. The first two quarterbacks come off the board, we want a quarterback, now we’re going to trade up,” Simms said. “The Giants have got holes everywhere. And we’re just going to leave holes and ‘hey, quarterback, save the day.’ That just doesn’t sound like the Giant way to me.”
When I ran the trade up from No. 6 to No. 3 in my most recent multi-round Giants mock draft, I used 2018 precedent set by the Jets and Colts of three second-round picks to move up. The down side of that scenario is that while the Giants get a quarterback at No. 3, they don’t pick again until No. 70 in Round 3.
www.nj.com/sports/2024/02/giants-daniel-jones-is-better-than-qb-whos-rising-up-mock-drafts-expert-says.html
For me, I personally would not be upset if we didn't get a QB in the first two rounds. I agree with Simms, we need to build the team. We are stuck with Jones and Cutlets anyways. Where I would be upset is if we dont at least take a late round QB at some point. Why? Because there is a chance, we could get lucky. This late round QB can sit an entire year and learn from Kaftka and Daboll, and if he dosent prove to be a future starter.... well then, he could develop into our back up QB for the next few years. Green Bay and San Francisco have a long history of drafting QBs in the later rounds even though they had a starting QB already. Even New England Patriots started doing the same thing. They produced Matt Cassell, Jimmy Garoppolo, and Jacoby Brissett, while still having Brady, in fact they had Bledsoe and then drafted Brady. They used some of those guys for draft capital too.
Build the damn team. I don't care how they do it: WR, LBer, CB, Guard, Tackle, RB, Safety, EDGE....crap we need everything. Get your blue-chip players with the first FOUR picks....players that can be studs, then get the best QB with one of our late picks.
These are the 3 guys I would look at. What do you think? Any of them look good to you? Do you have a guy you like?
Here is stats and film review on all three guys. The good and bad are discussed on all videos. When watching keep in mind, these guys will sit most if not all year one...and that's the way it should be anyway.
walterfootball.com/draft2024QB.php
Michael Pratt
2/27/24: Pratt was a consistent quarterback for the Green Wave over the last four years. In 2023, he completed 66 percent of his passes for 2,406 yards, 22 touchdowns and five interceptions. In 2022, he completed 64 percent of his passes for 3,010 yards, 27 touchdowns and five interceptions. Pratt has quality size to him. At the Senior Bowl, he did not impress enough to boost his draft stock.
Joe Milton
2/27/24: Milton started out his collegiate career at Michigan before transferring to Tennessee. With good size and a cannon for an arm, Milton has serious passing talent for the next level. Milton can be deadly when given time, but he does not throw well on the run. In the pocket, Milton can be accurate and challenge defenses at every level. In 2023, he completed 65 percent of his passes for 2,813 yards, 20 touchdowns and five interceptions. Milton had an inconsistent week of practice at the Senior Bowl
Spencer Rattler
2/27/24: Rattler completed 69 percent of his passes in 2023 for 3,186 yards, 19 touchdowns and eight interceptions. He picked up four rushing touchdowns as well. Despite the losses, Rattler played well including impressive games versus North Carolina and Georgia. Rattler impressed some NFL team sources with his arm, playmaking ability, and his ability to ad lib his team into some big plays. However, others said they are very down on him because of the turnovers and decision-making. They also noted that Rattler looked slower and less mobile in 2023.