Post by grizz299 on Dec 6, 2019 19:36:59 GMT -5
Why is that rellative ?? Well give me a minute!
Old friend Steve Spagnola has introduced new systems along with the few veterans. I listen to Andy Reid and commentators talk about the struggle they've experienced with Communications, missed assignments and wide open receivers.
The feeling is that that they are starting to come together now, that it's still got a long way to go but Kansas City fans and management are optimistic as the playoffs approach.
It is hard to read about their frustration and subsequent cautious optimism without relating it to our situation - relating it and finding hope amid our own frustration.
That's a veteran ball Club, a club that's contended for years .
I'm going to list again for maybe the fifth time the ball players we have that are new, either new to the team, the position or the league. I believe that most of the Advocates here really don't read anything that doesn't fit their agenda, but I love guys like Cali to really acknowledge the list and then tell me how anything but an inchoate meeting place for strangers.
The D line
WILLIAMS, RJ mcintosh..new
D. Lawrence....Rookie
B j Hill..2nd yr.
TOMLINSON. ..3rd yr.
Missing ...a single solid vet.no.. Jpp, snacks Harrison, Vernon or Collins
THE DEF. BACKFIELD
Peppers, Antoine ...new
Love, Baker, Ballyttne, Beal.4.rooks
Haley...2nd yr.
One Vet.
LINEBACKERS
M Golden, Bouchard...new
Ximines, Mayo, Connelly...rooks?
L. Carter.. 2d year
One Vet
This is not to say that the coaches have done a good job. But nobody could fuse cohesion and cogency from that many strangers.
When you break it out like that the transformation or rebuild is almost startling in its completeness.
I'm going to take the path least traveled; I think John Mara is a good football man, I think he must have insights as to the competency of the coaches - their work ethic, intelligence, schemes and ability to communicate. I hope he trusts his insights and his instincts and is strong enough to stand against the nattering of the ignorant pseudo experts. And, if on the other hand, he finds them lacking, I hope he moves with dispatch.
I know how little I know, how unqualified I am, I'll support whatever they do next.
For now I would just like a few of our more negative contributors to look at that list and tell me that competent coaching would have produced a competent defense.
Old friend Steve Spagnola has introduced new systems along with the few veterans. I listen to Andy Reid and commentators talk about the struggle they've experienced with Communications, missed assignments and wide open receivers.
The feeling is that that they are starting to come together now, that it's still got a long way to go but Kansas City fans and management are optimistic as the playoffs approach.
It is hard to read about their frustration and subsequent cautious optimism without relating it to our situation - relating it and finding hope amid our own frustration.
That's a veteran ball Club, a club that's contended for years .
I'm going to list again for maybe the fifth time the ball players we have that are new, either new to the team, the position or the league. I believe that most of the Advocates here really don't read anything that doesn't fit their agenda, but I love guys like Cali to really acknowledge the list and then tell me how anything but an inchoate meeting place for strangers.
The D line
WILLIAMS, RJ mcintosh..new
D. Lawrence....Rookie
B j Hill..2nd yr.
TOMLINSON. ..3rd yr.
Missing ...a single solid vet.no.. Jpp, snacks Harrison, Vernon or Collins
THE DEF. BACKFIELD
Peppers, Antoine ...new
Love, Baker, Ballyttne, Beal.4.rooks
Haley...2nd yr.
One Vet.
LINEBACKERS
M Golden, Bouchard...new
Ximines, Mayo, Connelly...rooks?
L. Carter.. 2d year
One Vet
This is not to say that the coaches have done a good job. But nobody could fuse cohesion and cogency from that many strangers.
When you break it out like that the transformation or rebuild is almost startling in its completeness.
I'm going to take the path least traveled; I think John Mara is a good football man, I think he must have insights as to the competency of the coaches - their work ethic, intelligence, schemes and ability to communicate. I hope he trusts his insights and his instincts and is strong enough to stand against the nattering of the ignorant pseudo experts. And, if on the other hand, he finds them lacking, I hope he moves with dispatch.
I know how little I know, how unqualified I am, I'll support whatever they do next.
For now I would just like a few of our more negative contributors to look at that list and tell me that competent coaching would have produced a competent defense.